7 Uncommon Characteristics Of Masculine Christian Men
Over the past two days people have asked me to give a list of what I would consider uniquely masculine characteristics of Christian men. Here they are. Tomorrow I’ll talk about the unique characteristics of masculine male Christian leaders.
Here goes…
1. Masculine men don’t have sex with other men.
One would think this would be self-explanatory, but not in today’s culture. I don’t care how tall, well-built, tough acting and great looking a guy is. If he has sex with another man, he is performing an act reserved only for women. In the truest sense, only effeminate men have sex with other men.
2. Masculine men are comfortable being the “head” of their wives.
Ephesians 5:23 says, “The husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior.” The word “head” in Greek (kephale) is used to describe an anatomical head, but also to describe to the point of a spear, the top of a wall, and the front of a ship. The context of Ephesians 5:23 tells us that just as Christ went ahead of the church to save it as its Savior (dying on the cross), the husband goes ahead of his wife and protects her (and as an indirect result his family). Masculine men lead their wives in the sense that they sacrifice for them, protect them, and keep them from experiencing undue stress, exhaustion, pain and hardship. Only effeminate men push their wives to go ahead of them and experience what they as husbands should experience.
3. Masculine Men treat their wives with tenderness.
1 Peter 3:7 tells us that husbands should treat their wives with respect “as the weaker partner.” In the Greek it literally says “weaker vessel,” referring to a woman’s smaller physical stature. Masculine men are both strong and tender at the same time. Effeminate men treat their wives as equals, verbally fighting (and sometimes physically fighting) under the assumption that “she is just as strong as I am and can handle it.”
4. Masculine men lead well and submit well.
Ephesians 5:21 tells us to “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.” Masculine men feel very comfortable leading their wives, but at the same time feel just as comfortable submitting to their wives, just as scripture teaches. Effeminate men never take the lead. They push for egalitarian relationships wherever they go.
5. Masculine men model for their children what a woman doesn’t look like.
Early childhood developmental psychologists call this “triadic family relationships.” Little girls learn how a woman acts not only by observing their mother, but by contrasting her with their father. The father demonstrates how a man acts and how a woman doesn’t act. Masculine men don’t dress like women. They don’t act like women. They don’t wear dresses and makeup. Of course there are common characteristics shared by both parents, but both go to great lengths to model what each specific gender looks like for their children. And unlike what our culture teaches us, that’s a good thing. As a proud father of three girls who routinely crush boys their age in soccer and Lacrosse, I want them to also know there are things they shouldn’t do as young women.
6. Masculine men are comfortable around other men.
Effeminate men were allowed at an early age to coddle whatever male-to-male relationship insecurities they had and spend more time among girls than boys. Rather than acknowledging what John Eldridge calls the “Father wound” in many men (lack of bonding with the father) and challenging men to bond with other men, church cultures often perpetuate a lack of authentic male relationship building opportunities (the very thing that can heal a father wound). Simply put, effeminate men spend most of their time with women or other effeminate men.
7. Masculine men speak the truth in love.
Effeminate men are afraid of confrontation. They gossip, slander and besmirch people, especially other men. Masculine men aren’t afraid to confront sin, call on people to change, and speak prophetically into people’s lives. Effeminate men only focus on feeling accepted and being inclusive. Masculine men aren’t afraid to speak the truth in love.
-- Leave a comment below, or stop and say “hello” on Twitter or Facebook.
Comments (9)
David Helton on Aug 4, 2009 10:32am
Brian,
I don't disagree with any of your characterizations of qualities men should possess. My only problem is your continued use of the term "effeminate" when describing negative traits. This denigrates women inmy opinion. For example, when you say an effeminate man is afraid of confrontation, the implication to me is that this negative trait is associated with the feminine gender and so women are afraid of confrontation. This is a broad sweeping negative generalization and is probably not your intention, but is what comes thru when such terms are used. Without the word "effeminate", I agree with everything you're saying. Thanks for your challenging ideas.
Brian Jones on Aug 4, 2009 10:49am
Hi David,
I appreciate you bringing that up again. I forgot to address that.
I agree with your observation. It might appear that when I use the term "effeminate" it is a shorthand way to paint female charactertsics as bad. That is in no way at all my intent. Not in the least. I just struggle with finding one specific word to convey what I'm trying to get across that isn't loaded. So I continued to use the word and hoped that by contextualizing it people would understand my intent and not focus on the word itself but the behaviors men should avoid.
Any one word suggestions?
Chris Bacus on Aug 4, 2009 2:09pm
One-word suggestions: unmasculine; unmanly; effete; feminized (perhaps suffers the same problem as "effeminate" when misunderstood; sissified; Richard Simmons-like (OK, that's not one word). If none of those work, I've got a Roget's.
SmartAlec on Aug 4, 2009 3:27pm
How about "faggy"?
That doesn't have anything to do with women at all.
Oh right...there's the whole prejudice and slandering of homosexuals thing...
Ethan Magness on Aug 4, 2009 4:19pm
I continue to be confused about your introduction of a gender identity expression as a category in this conversation. These gendered roles are cultural constructs.
It is true that Christian men should not have sex with other men. It is true that Christian men should speak the truth in love. There is nothing particularly gendered about these roles and by using these kinds of examples as definitions of masculine you are defining masculine to mean "those things which the Bible calls Christian men to do." Therefore it will become a tautology to then conclude Christian men should be more masculine. It seems to me that using this method to define masculine does real damage to the reality that this is word that is used by our culture in many different ways. Some are good and some are bad.
Of course if "speak the truth in love" is part of the definition of masculine then we need more masculine pastors.
Yet surely you think that the ideal Christian woman would do this as well and now the usefulness of the gendered category has fallen away.
By all means let us engage with the teaching of Ephesians 5. But let us not use the label "masculine" to define our goal. Rather let us use the same label Paul uses, "Christlike." The church needs pastors who are Christlike.
Christlike men men don’t have sex with other men.
Christlike men are comfortable being the “head” of their wives (in the same way that Christ exercises his headship of the church).
Christlike men treat their wives with tenderness.
You want one word to describe how men shouldn't act? How about, fallen, unrightteous, sinful, lost, dead?
The goal is not to be more masculine, even after we co-opt the word to make it mean whatever we want it to. The goal is to be more Christlike.
It might be useful for the church to engage with culture and suggest that the cultural definition of masculinity is unhelpful and actually leads away from Christlikeness. But to suggest that pastor need to be more masculine and then define masculine using the basic teachings of scripture to all men (and in some cases to all people) leaves the term "masculine" with no independent meaning or function except to introduce cultural gender notions into a conversation that so far seems to be centered on Christlikeness and not masculinity.
Now I am going to have to go calm down with my knitting and a chai tea.
Brian Jones on Aug 4, 2009 4:33pm
Hi Ethan,
I guess where we differ is that I don't believe gender roles are only cultural constructs. Gen. 1:28 tells us "...male and female he created them." Then throughout scripture specific commands are given to men, then to women, and then to both together.
I think the combination of being created separately, then given separate tasks/commands at times, creates for us biblically defined gender roles separate from culturally defined gender roles. Titus 2:1-15 and other passages like it, in my mind at least, makes this perfectly clear.
The issue for me is "What does it mean for a woman to become Christ-like? For a man to become Christ-like?" While the fruit of the spirit, for instance, as well as 1 Cor. 13, apply to both genders, Titus 2 and other passages outline unique challenges men and women each must address separately based on their gender and the roles they play both in marriage, the family and the church.
Ethan thank you for your thoughtful responses in this dialogue!
Brian
Ethan Magness on Aug 4, 2009 5:02pm
Hey Brian,
I am in total agreement with your recent comment.
There are certainly are gendered roles that are beyond cultural constructs and in my hasty responses I glossed over this reality. Thanks for the accurate critique.
Nevertheless, I think that the word masculinity is a largley culturally defined concept, and unless we lead with a redefinition of the word, the phrase, "we need need more masculine pastors" seems to be dangerously undefined.
I am in full support of the goal to redefine masculinity on biblical term and especially Christo-centric terms.
"Real men cry." Real mean sweat blood." Real men don't fight back." Real men die to save others." "Real men go to parties." "Real men pray all night long." "Real mean lead through submission."
I know that I introduced the phrase "gender roles." That was a mistake. My concern is with terms that focus on the natural variations of gender expression. I am concerned that using this language leads us too quickly into dangerous sterotypes that have little to do with the teachings of scripture and much to do with the expectations of our culture.
You write: "The issue for me is "What does it mean for a woman to become Christ-like? For a man to become Christ-like?"
To that I say a hearty Amen and Amen. That is what I hoped my first comment suggested. These suggestions you make are good in so far as they are things that all Christian men should seek. There is nothing masculine or manly about them as far as I can tell. Rather they are Christian.
David Helton on Aug 4, 2009 7:15pm
Thank you Ethan for saying so eloquently what I tried to say in each of my posts. Thank you again Brian for challenging us to think about these things.
Andrew on Aug 5, 2009 6:18pm
Why does anyone care what your (and when I say you I mean you or any other personspastorspreachers) characteristics are? When did any one other persons opinion become a better interpretation of God's will over anothers? People should make their own choices and not follow anyone's "lead" when it comes to their relationship with God. Eliminate the middle man on Earth (all organized religion), create your own relatinship with God, one on one.